sanat etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
sanat etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

30 Ağustos 2025 Cumartesi

Türk Sanatı

 


Yuka Kadoi'ya:

Görseldeki kesinlikle Pers Sanatı değildir. Pers Sanatı hakkında yazıyorsanız Pers Sanatı kullanın, Türk Sanatı değil! Okuyucuların bilinçaltına "görsel=Pers" işliyor ve yanıltıyorsunuz! Birçok kişi bu görselin açıklamasını okumaz, içinde doğru açıklaması olsa da! Peki var mı?

SB


*

To Yuka Kadoi:

Congrats? 

The image on the cover is definitely not Persian art. If you're writing about Persian art, please use Persian art, and not Turkish art! You're subconsciously embedding the "this image = Persian", and you're misleading your readers! Many people won't read the description of this image, even if it contains a correct description inside! Does it have the correct description?

Yuka Kadoi, is a faculty member of University of Vienna, Institut für Kunstgeschichte / Department of Art History.





ROYAL SELJUK-TURK CARVED STUCCO PANEL,

Form (not Persian!) IRAN, 12TH CENTURY



 




#Türksanatı #Türk #sanat #art

#Turkishart  and not #Persian 


13 Ağustos 2025 Çarşamba

No Culture when it Suits You!

 

Metropolitan Müzesi ve Sanat Tarihçilerinin

İkiyüzlülüğü,

Önyargısı,

Politik görüşü,

Propaganda, gerçekler değil ve

Bilinçaltına etkisi!

Not Asia Minor and definitely not Smyrna
it is Türkiye and İzmir
















Metropolitan Müzesi'ne;
Neden Türk Kültürü veya Sanatı olarak sınıflandırmıyorsunuz? Büyük bir aile olduğumuz ve zengin bir kültüre sahip olduğumuz için mi? Yoksa adımızı mı söylemekten korkuyorsunuz? Eserlerin İran, Mısır veya Suriye'den gelmesi de önemli değil. Selçuklular Türk'tür. Kıpçaklar/ Kumanlar/ Memlükler Türk'tür. Yani hepsi Türk Kültürü ve Sanatı'nın içinde yer alır.

Bu arada, başka kültürlere (örneğin Hint, Çin vb.) ait eserlerin kültür gruplarını yazıyorsunuz. Bu ikiyüzlülüğe son veriniz!

*
To Metropolitan Museum;
Why don't you classify it as Turkish Culture or Art? Is it because we are a big family and have a rich culture? Or are you afraid to say our name? It doesn't matter whether the works come from Iran, Egypt, or Syria. The Seljuks are Turks. The Kipchaks/Cumans/Mamluks are Turks. So, they are all within the Turkish Culture and Art.

Meanwhile, the works that belongs to other cultures (e.g., India, China, etc.) are being written. Stop this Hypocrisy,

Prejudiced,

Political,

Propaganda, not facts, and

Subconsicious influence

of Metropolitan Museum and Art Historians!

SB


Département des Arts de l'Islam - Louvre

 

Louvre Müzesi'ne;

"İslam Sanatı Bölümü" değil;

"#Türk Sanatı Bölümü" olmalı !



es-tu sûr ? ;)
are you sure?










Le musée du Louvre devrait avoir un « département d’art turc » au lieu d’un « département d’art islamique » !

The Louvre Museum should have a “Turkish Art Department” instead of an “Islamic Art Department”!



İlgili:

Neden Türk Kültürü ve Medeniyeti Demezler?


28 Eylül 2024 Cumartesi

Baybars, Bundukdar

Blown and tooled, with fired enamels and gold, height 19 cm

Egypt or Syria, late 13th - early 14th century AD


Enamelled glass stand featuring a #Mamluk princely blazon of courtly office (bow and two arrows, for a "bunduqdar", or Keeper of the Bow), with Chinese-style lotuses and phoenixes and bands with processions of real and mythical quadrupeds.

The Al-Sabah Collection


* Bunduqdar - Bundukdar was used by the Mamluk - #Kipchak #Turks as a title.

- Baybars I (1223-1277), full name; el-Melikü’z-Zâhir Rüknüddîn es-Sâlihî el-Bundukdârî, was the kağan (kaghan) of the Mamluk Turkish State, which was called as "Dawlat al-Turk (State of Turk)" or as "Dawlat al-Turkiyya (Turkish State)", who ruled (1260-77) in Egypt and Syria. So, the two arrows means = Keeper of Two Lands. And Turkish male name Baybars means "bay  -rich person, noble, sir" , "pars/bars - leopard, panther".




SB


#ArtofTurks

#art

#Turks


PS: A note to Mr. Alami;
It may be the Fatimid period, but it's a Mamluk, i.e. Kipchak-Turk Art. Even the "cup" (the Kipchak Tamga-sign) on it says "I'm Turk", along with "Art of the Steppes."



Example: Mamluk Armor with the "cup" tamga, 1428/43




Halıları boyayan sanatçı

 

'Büyük Bozkır Kraliçeleri'ni halılar üzerine boyayan sanatçı

Assel Sabyrzhanovna / 2023


"Herkes Tomiris'i, Aliya Moldagulova'yı tanıyor. Ama unutulmuş kahraman kızlarımızdan kaç tane var? Örneğin, birçok kişi Gaukhar Batyr (1700-1756), Aibike Batyr (Aybike Batur), Suyunbike (Süyün Bike 1516-1557) ve Bopay'ı (1690-1780) bilmiyor. Genç Kazak kahraman kızlarına, tarihimizdeki güçlü kadınları göstermek istedim."






link:


Heroic mothers of the great steppe

Author: Айнур Жумагазина

Qazaqstan History - link



17 Haziran 2024 Pazartesi

İskit-Kelt

 

İskit-Türklerinin MÖ 7.yy'dan sonra belirli aralıklarla Macaristan ovalarına yerleştiği, sonradan gelen Kelt kavimleriyle de karıştıkları arkeolojik buluntularla ortaya konulmuştur. Aynı sonuç Ukrayna ve Romanya'da da karşımıza çıkar. Hatta atası Yamnaya olan sözde Savaş Baltası Kültürü (Battle Axe-Culture) içinde dahi Kimmer-İskit karışımı görülüyor.


Bird brooch on the left, is not a "Frankish Art", but Scythian and Hun. The fact is, even it was found in France, does not make this art "Frankish" !

Archaeological findings show that Scythian Turks settled in the Hungarian plains periodically after the 7th century BC and mixed with the Celtic tribes that came later. The same result is also found in Ukraine and Romania. Even within the so-called Battle Axe Culture, whose ancestors were the Yamnaya, a Cimmerian-Scythian mixture is seen.


SB



Celts or Galatians

Kelt Düğümü dedikleri de Türk Düğümü'dür.



26 Ocak 2024 Cuma

Han Hanedanlığında Hun Türkleri

 

İçi boş tuğla mezar karoları, Luoyang, Henan Eyaleti, Çin

Doğu Han Hanedanı, MS 25-220


Han dönemi deseler de süslemeler Türk Sanatına aittir. Bu da sahibi Hun-Türk mü, sorusunu akla getirir. Çünkü Ho-han-yeh Tanhu döneminde (MÖ 1.yy) Güney Hun Türkleri Hanlara karışıp zamanla Çinleşmişti. Ancak mezar karolarında görüldüğü gibi Hun-Türkleri Çinleşmiş olsa da Hun-Türk kültür ve sanatını devam ettirmiş. Bu betimlemeler diğer Türk boyları ve özellikle Anadolu Türkleriyle de devam ettiği için, kim ne derse desin, Türk Sanatı binlerce yıl sürekliliğini korumuştur. 

SB

NOT: 2016'da aynı damgayı Arizona'da bulmuştum


Liderliğini Ho‐han‐yeh’in kardeşi Sol Bilge Eligi Çi‐çi’nin yaptığı istiklal taraftarlarının fikirleri şöyleydi: “Hunlar cesareti ve kuvveti takdir ederler. Bağımlı olmak ve kölelik onlara en adi bir şey olarak gelir. At sırtında savaşmak ve mücadele etmek süratiyle devlet kuruldu. Kavimler arasında kuvvet ve otorite kazanıldı. Yiğit cengâverler ölünceye kadar savaşmalı ki, varlığımızı devam ettirebilelim. Şimdi iki kardeş, taht için mücadele etmektedir. Sonunda ya büyüğü ya küçüğü devlete sahip olacaktır. Gerçi şimdi, Çin bizden daha güçlüdür; fakat (bu durumda bile) Hun ülkesini ilhak edemez! Niçin kendimizi Çin’e bağımlı kılalım? Atalarımızın devletini niye Çinlilere devredelim? Bu, ölmüş atalarımıza büyük hakaret olur. Böylece, komşu devletler arasında gülünç duruma düşeriz. Evet, bu suretle (Çin’e bağlanmak) sükûnet tekrar tesis edilebilse bile, kavimler arasında yeniden üstünlüğümüzü elde edebilir miyiz? Biz ölsek de kahramanlığımızın şöhreti artacak. Oğullarımız ve torunlarımız daima devletin hâkimi olacaklar."

Ali Ahmetbeyoğlu // Hun Devletlerinin Kuruluş ve Çöküş Süreçleri, 2007




Turkish Warrior; "Turkish Shot" and Horse with "Knotted Tail"

Left: Tarskii Northern Ossetia,catacomb 6 (8th-9th c AD)

Right: Sulek- Khakasia (Hakasya)

Khazar Turkish Warrior - Belt, 8th-9th c.

"Turkish Shot" and his Horse with Knotted Tail.




Art and Culture of the Turkish Tribes.

South Hun-Turks

The Southern (Eastern) Hun-Turks assimilated and became Chinese over time.



A Turkish Warrior; "Turkish shot" and his Horse with Knotted Tail.

Tang Period, 7th c / Metropolitan Museum

(not a phoenix, but a rooster, and not China Culture! / Link for Seljuk Turks Period)



All hope of the resurrection of the Hunnish power, however, was completely wrecked by the internal revolutions which broke out in the Hunnish Kingdom just at this time. The Shanyu who ruled from 60-58 B.C., himself a usurper though belonging to the imperial family, proved so brutal and so unpopular a ruler that civil war broke out on all sides. Even after this particular ruler had been forced to commit suicide and the legitimate claimant (whose name, Huhansie, it is necessary for us to remember since he was later to play a very important part in history) was placed on the throne in 58 b.c., order was very far from being restored. By this time the Huns had become so accustomed to bloody battles between rival pretenders that it was difBcult for them to settle down once more under a unified rule. In fact, during the period 58-55 b.c., we find no less than five of the Hunnish princes setting themselves up as Shanyus and conducting bloody campaigns against one another.

By 55 B.C. Huhansie had succeeded in eliminating his four rivals; but no sooner had this been done than his own brother, Jiji by name, rose in revolt and succeeded in causing Huhansie untold embarrassment. Neither of the two brothers could win a really crushing victory over the other. Consequendy, for the next two decades Mongolia was divided into two separate kingdoms, which are usually known as the Northern and Southern Kingdoms. Jiji’s main strength was in the north, in what is now Outer Mongolia, while Huhansie was able to maintain control in the south or what is now known as Inner Mongolia.

The great cleavage of the Huns into northern and southern divisions reacted enormously to the advantage of China. As was to be expected, the Huns were kept so busy fighting among themselves that they had no chance to attack the Celestial Empire. Far more important was the fact that in 53 b.c. Huhansie, the lord of the Southern Huns, felt so hard pressed by his brother’s hordes that he convened a grand council of his nobles to discuss with them the question of seeking safety and protection by formally submitting to Chinese jurisdiction.

Most of the Hunnish nobles violently opposed the idea. “It has always been the custom of the Huns,” they said, “to admire spirited action and to despise servility. Mounted on their horses, they have always been ready to rush into battle without fear of death. For this reason their name and fame has been spread far and wide.

"At present, to be sure, there is a battle between older brother and younger brother for control of the Kingdom, but what matter is it if one or the other perishes as long as the imperial house goes on and provides rulers for our Empire.? Though China is strong, she has never been able to crush the Huns. For what reason, therefore, should we submit to Chinese rulership.? To do so would mean a break with all our traditions, would be insulting the spirits of our former rulers, and we would become an object of ridicule among all nations.”

One or two of the most intimate advisers of the Shanyu, however, spoke warmly in favor of offering homage to the Celestial Empire, approaching the matter from a realistic point of view. “Each country has a period of prosperity and a period of decline. At present we see that Chinese influence is everywhere predominant, reaching even to the Wusun and the city states of Kashgaria. For many decades the Huns have been on the decline, and at present there is no chance of restoring their fallen fortunes. In spite of all our exertions, we have experienced scarcely a single day of tranquillity. If we now bow to the inevitable and subject ourself to China, we shall have peace and quiet; if not, we shall continue in a state of danger and uncertainty.”

Although the notables in favor of the project were definitely in the minority, Huhansie himself was quite won over by their arguments and forced the others to agree to the plan. Moving southward at the head of his horde, he eventually came near to the Great Wall. From this point an envoy was sent to the Chinese court to announce the formal submission of the Huns and to ask that a time be appointed when the Shanyu might appear in person at the court to do obeisance.

When this envoy reached the Chinese court, there was much fuss and excitement. There was universal jubilation but also much controversy as to the treatment to be accorded the Shanyu when the time came for him to make his personal appearance. Should the Shanyu be forced to prostrate himself or be allowed merely to bow.? Should the Shanyu be ranked above or below the rulers of the various principalities into which China proper was still divided ? These and a hundred similar questions caused the ritual-loving Celestials great mental perturbation. At length the Emperor decided the matter to his own satisfaction. The Shanyu was to be treated as a friendly vassal, enjoying the privilege of a guest, and not as a conquered enemy. He was to be accorded precedence over all the other vassal princes; but, in addressing the Emperor, he had to speak of himself as “Your Servant.” He was not, however, to speak of himself by name. With reference to the last stipulation it should be remarked that in Chinese etiquette the use of one’s personal name in place of a personal pronoun is considered a sign of complete submission to the interlocutor.

As soon as all these weighty matters had been settled, it was possible for Huhansie to make his ceremonial visit to China. This visit took place during the New Year’s festivities in 51 b.c. and occasioned the display of much pomp and power on the part of the Chinese. The Shanyu was treated with every consideration in order to induce him to remain in vassalage to China. In addition he and his followers were given a large number of valuable presents. After all, the Huns had to be shown that it was well worth their while to submit to the Son of Heaven.

The question now naturally arises—what, in the meantime, had become of the rival Shanyu, Jiji, who had so long lorded it over Northern or Outer Mongolia? The answer to this query is an interesting one and throws much fight on contemporary events in many different parts of Central Asia. Ever since his brother and rival, Huhansie, had thrown himself upon the mercy of China (53 b.c.), Jiji had been in a quandary as to the best course of action to pursue. As long as Huhansie received Chinese support and protection, Jiji felt that his rival could not be really crushed in a military campaign. At first he hoped, by diplomatic means, to be able to loosen the tie between Huhansie and the Chinese. With this end in view, Jiji also entered into friendly relations with the Chinese court; and, though he would not formally declare himself a vassal nor come in person to the Chinese capital to do obeisance to the Dragon Throne, he sent his son to serve half as hostage and half as page in the Chinese court. Moreover, for several years thereafter he continued to send, at intervals, tributary presents to the Celestial Emperor.

But though Jiji’s son and other envoys from the Northern Huns were received in a friendly manner by the Chinese, the latter showed quite plainly that Huhansie and the Southern Huns, as avowed vassals, were their favorites. By 49 b.c. Jij'i had begun to realize that he would have to rely upon something other than diplomacy if he were to create for himself a really great empire. He determined to be a great conqueror even if he could not be a great diplomat.

Although Jiji’s original domain had been Northeastern Mongolia, it would seem as if he made no attempt to extend the boundary of his kingdom eastward. Common sense prevented him from marching southward and attacking the combined armies of China and his rival, Huhansie. Following an old ancestral urge, he determined to march westward and establish his headquarters in Zungaria and Turkistan. (...)

The westward migration of Jiji and the northern migration of Huhansie brought about a curious situation. For several years, the Huns had been divided into two kingdoms which we have called the Northern and Southern Kingdoms. After all this shifting of population, the two rival Hunnish Kingdoms continued to exist; but they can no longer be called the Northern and Southern Kingdoms but must now be referred to as the Western and Eastern Kingdoms, the one in Zungaria and Turkistan, the other in Mongolia.

McGovern,William Montgomery // Early Empires of Central Asia 1939



The Southern (Eastern) Hun-Turks

Footnote: Even in the 6th century Turks among Chinese

Empress Ashina (551–582), empress of the Chinese/Xianbei dynasty Northern Zhou. She was the daughter of Göktürk's (Turkish Khaganate) Muqan Khagan (Reign: 553-572) son of Bumin Khagan. Her brothers are Apa Qaghan and Yangsu Tegin/Tigin (Prince). Her husband was Emperor Wu. 


Book; "They were Once Turk. Chinese Families of Turkish Origin" bu Kürşat Yıldırım, 2018

"The Effects of Turks on the Political and Cultural History of the Far East" by Prof. Dr. Alimcan Inayet (Journal of Turkish World Studies, Volume: VIII, Issue 1,2008)

"The number of Uighur Turks settled in different regions of the Tang/T'ang Dynasty reached hundreds of thousands. Thousands of Uighur Turk families settled in the capital Chang-an. Turks and Chineseized Turks had a great influence on many political and military activities during the Sui and Tang dynasties. Therefore, the lineage of the ruling dynasty of the Tang/T'ang Dynasty was also mixed with Turks. Of the 369 viziers in the dynasty, 36 were of Turkish descent. Tang/T'ang power relied heavily on foreign power."


"About Several Hun Ruler Kurgan and Tombs in China in the IV-V. Centuries" by Tilla Deniz Baykuzu, Ege Uni.TID,vol.XX,no:2, 2005

"The oldest Turkic kurgans found as a result of archaeological excavations are the Pazyryk and Noin-ula kurgans. Pazyryk dates to the III century BC and Noin-ula to the I century BC. The Huns lived and established states in vast territories from Southern Siberia to the steppes of Mongolia and from there to the interior of China. Therefore, it would be correct to look for the kurgans of the later periods of the Huns in these geographies."


SB