TARİH VE ARKEOLOJİ: The Turks

Turks possess one of the oldest cultures and civilizations in the world. It is hard to precisely specify the beginning of Turkish history. There is a high probability that the oldest culture of Central Asia, the so-called Anav Culture, which was unearthed at the end of toilsome archaeological and anthropological research and has a history that goes back to 4000 B.C., has ties to proto-Turks. As we move forward into the more recent millennia of history, we more clearly see the linkage between the cultures of Kelteminar and Afenesavo (3000 B.C.), Andronova (1700 B.C. Andronova is the name of the man who worked here, is not the name of the people who lived here!), Karasuk (1200 B.C.), Tagar and Tashtyk (700 B.C.) and proto-Turks. There is plenty of scientific evidence proving this linkage, most notably among archaeological findings obtained from the Pazyryk and Issyk mounds. Issyk is also the old name of todays İskenderun Gulf in Turkey.

So is Urmia, South of todays Turkey and Mesopotamia triangle; with Subar (Suvar Turks, ancestors of Chuvash and Bulgarian Turks), Turukku (to see in Akkadian cuneiform Turuk), Lullubi, Elamites, Kut (Gutians), Kassites are Turkish tribes and are the ancestors of Central Asia Turks. Russian scholars says; "there is no life before 6000 BC in central Asia." The cradle of the Turks is not Altai, but Anatolia (Asia Minor), Azarbaijan, steppes of Turkmenistan, İran plateau and Mesopotamia. The Turks lived, grew up, died in the Altai's , but they did not born there, they came from the west.

Trojan war, heroes Priam, Hector, Aeneas, who are they? It was a war between the Turks and the Hellens. Aeneas was the nephew of Priam, sailed to Italy after the fall of Troy. Sakamander (scamander), the river near Troy, comes from Saka's. Hector is actually Ector. Tor, Tar, Tur is the proto word for Turk. Priams ancestor was called Teucer. They called themselves not Trojans but Teucers.

Indo-Europeans didn't reach İran in 1500 BC, they came in 800 BC. Scholars tried to take back to 9th c BC, but they failed. There is no Indo-Europeans; Thomas Young minted the term “Indo-European” in 1813. There is also no Indo-Iranian, Indo-Germanic and Aryan race... There is no Indo-European language too...Proto-Indo-European, that does not even exist! If Indo-Europe is together, why on earth are the "Europeans" always enemy of Indo, and hostile and racist to them and have imperialism thoughts?

The existing of the language families , "Indo-European", Semitic and Turkish language was formed between 12000-6000 BC. Turkish language separate in 6000 BC as west-east Turkish, like Chuvash / Huns / Bulgars west and Kazakh / Turkmens / Azarbaijan / Turkey east. Sumerian language is an agglutinative language like Turkish, scholars from the west do accept that, even Samuel Noah Kramer says :"Sumerian is non-indo-european and non-semitic, but an agglutinative language". So they are not the ancestor of Indo-Europeans, because they are Turkish tribes. They have, even found similitaries between the Akkadian and Turkish language. Dravidians, Japanese, Koreans, Mongols, Etruscans have Turkish roots or are language family.

In the meantime, research carried out over the last several years supports the argument that the Scythian civilization that emerged in the eighth century B.C. was a Turkish empire. As the Cimmerians, Massagetaes, which is full with Turkish names ; Tomrys, Turkish Queen , Saka ruler Alp Er Tunga (Alpar Tunga), Scilurus (Scyth+il ; land of the Scythians/Sakas), Palacus (Pala is Bala; child,son) When Alexander the Great came to east , and faced with the Sacae/Saka King : " ..Now in us you will have incourruptible guardians both of Asia and Europe: there is only the Tanais between us and Bactria, and beyond the Tanais we extend our selves as far as Thrace, and Tharace is said to border upon Macedonia. Thus you see we are your neighbours in both your empires. Consider therefore, whether you will have us for your friends, or your enemies." Saka's/Sacae and Scythians are one nation.

There is no doubt among historians about the Turkish nature of the Great Hun Empire, which ruled between 318 B.C. and 216 A.D., as well as that of its predecessor proto-Huns, whose presence was confirmed by Chinese sources. The Great Hun Empire, the Western Hun Empire and especially the European Huns were examined comprehensively by Western historians. like Hephthalites (White Huns) There are not many people who do not know the story of the Great Hun Emperor Mete Khan (Mao-tun, Oghuz Khan according to Turkish epics) and the glorious Turkish Khan Atilla (Attila the Hun). European Huns changed the course of world history as a result of the Germanic Migrations, and they started to build the European nations and countries.

The best-known part of the Turkish history can be traced back to the Göktürks. Following the Göktürks were the Uyghurs, who presented the best examples of Turkish sedentary culture; the Kyrgyz, Qarluks, Turgish, Tatars and other Turkish tribes of Central Asia; the Khazars, who turned their country into an attractive center of trade; the Bulgars, who shaped today’s Eastern Europe; and then the Oghuz, Avars, the Pechenegs, Qumans (Cumans) Kipchaks. They all took their places in Turkish history, one after another. The White Huns (Hephthalites), Kipchak Turks are white skin, blue eyes (Blue eyes comes from one genepool), there are also red hair, white skin Turks in the Tarim basin (tarim is turkish word :agriculture), to see also in Thousand Buddha Caves frescos. Buddha was a Saka prince. (Scythian Sakyas-Saka's-Sacae) "Gotama the Buddha, Siddartha, the Sakya-tion, the "lion (Simha) of the Sakya tribe" "Lord of the Sakyas" died in 543 BC, belong to non-Aryans."

Throughout history, Turks founded a total of 113 states, 16 of which are deemed to be large. These states and empires came to dominate large sections of world geography at different times in history. And when the Orkhon Monuments were erected in the 6th c AD, there was no French or German as nation to call.

The European scholars don't want to understand that, because they were "told" always, "others" are "lower" civilization , and "themselves" are "higher" civilizations. Domestication of the Horses, writing systems, laws, language influences; The civilization is nothing without the Turks and the History of the world can not be told without the Turks. The Turks are a big family is not just Turkey Turks or Azarbaijan Turks. This is the naked truth and has nothing to do with nationalism.

Regards,
SB.